IntelXview

IntelXview AI Control Plane

Give AI agents the freedom to act. Keep control of what they do.

Talk through your workflow

An initial conversation about one workflow, to see whether ACP could help. No charge, no pressure. Booking or attending the call does not commit you to buying anything; any paid work needs a separate written scope and price that you choose to accept. To change or cancel, reply to your calendar invitation.

AI Control Plane checks each action an agent sends through it before it runs, and records the decision.

On the agent actions you route through ACP:

  • Autonomy

    Put more AI agents to work.

  • Prevention

    Stop unauthorised actions before they happen.

  • Revocation

    Withdraw an agent's authority when needed.

    A paid pilot can test whether withdrawing an agent's authority prevents its subsequent actions on the workflow connected to ACP.

  • Accountability

    Know who authorised what, and keep the evidence.

Actions that bypass ACP are outside these controls.

Already using ACP? Sign in

A proof run, with its limits visible

ACP public evidence screen · 4 October 2026

In plain terms: an automated test run of ACP's controls covered all 8 critical steps and passed, on 4 October 2026. It shows the product working, not the outcome of your workflow.

ACP public proof-run status, dated 4 October 2026, with the evidence-chain result and assurance note
This capture shows one automated proof run. It does not establish the outcome of your workflow. Inspect the current evidence and limits.

What holds agents back

Agents stay in pilots when nobody can say what they may do.

Before an agent takes actions that matter, someone has to answer three things: what it may do, who approves the risky actions, and what record exists when someone asks later.

The examples here are themes we heard in recent conversations with practitioners and delivery partners. They are not survey results.

  • Access that outlives a role

    Someone changes role, but the agent acting for them keeps the old permissions.

  • Approvals that turn into a queue

    Sensitive actions wait for sign-off, and people find a way round the approval.

  • Rules nobody can explain later

    After a handover, no one can say why the agent may do what it does.

How ACP does it

Decide, approve and prove, for each agent action.

  • Decide

    Allowed or refused, before it runs

    You set what each agent may do. Requests outside that permission are refused on routes connected to ACP.

  • Approve

    A named approver for chosen changes

    Changes you choose can be held until a named approver decides, and the decision is recorded.

  • Prove

    A record of every decision

    Each allow, refusal and approval is recorded so it can be reviewed later.

Scope. ACP controls only the actions sent through it. Each tool or environment needs an integration. Anything that bypasses ACP is outside these controls.

See how it works

One example

One action, three possible outcomes.

  1. An agent asks to send a payment to a supplier.
  2. ACP checks the request against the permission you set.
  3. Within the permission, it is allowed. Outside it, it is refused. Above an approval threshold, it waits for a named person.
  4. Each outcome is written to a decision record.

See a published record

From a demonstration tenant with synthetic data. It is not a customer result.

Scope. This applies only to actions routed through ACP. Actions that bypass ACP are outside these controls.

  1. 1 · Agent request

    “Send a payment to a supplier”

  2. 2 · ACP check

    Against the permission you set

  3. 3 · One of three outcomes

    • Allowed

      Within the permission

    • Refused

      Outside the permission

    • Needs human approval

      Held until a named person decides

  4. 4 · Decision record

    Each outcome is recorded for review

Illustration, not product evidence.

Where ACP fits

Workflows where an agent takes a consequential action.

For example, an agent that sends a payment, changes a production schedule or updates a patient record. What matters is the action, someone who owns it, and a route we can send through ACP.

These are examples of actions, not customer deployments.

What the first call covers

  1. 1

    We talk through one workflow, its owner and the result you want. No charge.

  2. 2

    If ACP looks useful, we send a written scope for a paid pilot: the actions, tests, acceptance criteria, dependencies, deliverables and price.

  3. 3

    You decide. A paid pilot starts only after you accept that written scope and price.

Before a paid pilot. A paid pilot may start with a controlled demonstration on synthetic data. Installing ACP in your environment, cloud permissions and integration are scoped and priced as separate stages. A demonstration on synthetic data does not show that a live workflow is protected.

Talk through one workflow.

Bring a short description of the workflow and who owns it.

Talk through your workflow

An initial conversation about one workflow, to see whether ACP could help. No charge, no pressure. Booking or attending the call does not commit you to buying anything; any paid work needs a separate written scope and price that you choose to accept. To change or cancel, reply to your calendar invitation.

Already using ACP? Sign in

AI Control Plane demonstration

90 seconds · Captioned · No audio · Recorded August 2026

A fictional organisation and synthetic data show an allowed action, a refused action and a decision-chain check. The example covers the demonstrated ACP workflow. It does not establish production-key custody.

Read the demonstration steps and limitations

Product access opens sign-in. An initial conversation about one workflow, to see whether ACP could help. No charge, no pressure. Booking or attending the call does not commit you to buying anything; any paid work needs a separate written scope and price that you choose to accept. To change or cancel, reply to your calendar invitation.