IntelXview

AI activity leaves before the policy catches up

Your AI policy is not proof

A client asks whether their data entered an AI tool. The policy says it should not have. What can you actually show them?

IntelXview finds the gap between approved use and real activity, then helps you put accountable controls and evidence around it.

10 questions. About 3 minutes. Results appear after the email gate.

The first paid step

Test the exposure, not the confidence level

The AI Data Leakage Risk Assessment is £2,250 fixed price and delivered over two weeks. It examines where workplace AI can receive sensitive data, which controls are operating and what evidence is missing.

You receive a prioritised report built for a security, risk or compliance owner. Scope and price are clear before work starts.

Fixed price
£2,250
Delivery
Two weeks
Output
Exposure map, control gaps, evidence position and prioritised actions

When evidence needs to operate every day

Move from assessment to controlled AI use

Start ACP with 6 free credits, 1 user and 1 project using low-cost routing. A verified company email is required. No card.

See the decision

Record the actor, policy, route and outcome for governed requests.

Continue by choice

Eligible free-trial accounts see the prepaid beta terms inside ACP when the small trial has done its job.

Stop without a trapdoor

No subscription or automatic renewal. Add credit manually. Evidence and exports remain available at zero balance.

Behaviour-change support is included with paid ACP. It is not sold separately.

Built from the accountability end

Security architecture before software theatre

IntelXview was founded by Anthony Tabbiruka, a security architect focused on the awkward distance between a control described on paper and a decision someone can defend later.

That is why the work starts with exposure and evidence, then earns the right to discuss software.

A necessary caveat

IntelXview is participating in FCA AI Supercharged Sandbox Cohort 2. Participation supports testing and does not imply FCA approval, endorsement, authorisation, certification or product validation.

Insights

Practical notes for the person carrying the risk

All insights

Incident Analysis

An Incident Response Readiness Checklist for Regulated Firms

A documented incident response plan is a starting point, not a guarantee of readiness. This checklist covers the six domains regulated UK firms need to have in place before an incident happens, from governance and detection through to post-incident review.

Read insight

AI Governance

How to Stop Staff Pasting Sensitive Data into AI Tools

Staff paste client data, legal documents, and financial records into ChatGPT and Copilot every day. Most firms have a policy that forbids it and no control that enforces it. Here is how to build something that actually holds.

Read insight

AI Governance

Is Gemini for Google Workspace Safe? Data Exposure Risks

Gemini for Google Workspace is safe at the platform level, but it inherits whatever sharing and permission sprawl already exists in your Drive and Gmail. Here is where the real data exposure risk sits, and what to examine before you let Gemini loose on your organisation.

Read insight