Recompute a decision chain
Six published records from a demonstration tenant. Recomputing the chain checks internal consistency; it does not establish who produced it.
Inspect the records and methodIntelXview AI Control Plane
Control what AI agents can do. Prove what they did.
ACP checks requests routed through it against policy and records the decision for review.
Opens the ACP sign-in page.
A proof run, with its limits visible
ACP public evidence screen · 4 October 2026
Before an AI agent acts, what is it authorised to do?
Follow one governed action.
Start with the agent’s identity and authority. Follow the policy decision, then inspect the record it leaves.
- 01
Identity
Which agent or person is making the request?
- 02
Authority
What are they allowed to do?
- 03
Mandate
What is the permitted purpose and scope of this job?
- 04
Policy decision
Does this request meet the configured rules?
- 05
Enforcement
Apply the decision on the route through ACP.
- 06
Evidence
Keep the decision record available for review.
This is an explanation of the control path. Enforcement depends on the configured integration: activity that bypasses ACP is outside this path. Read the product boundary.
Evidence you can inspect
What would you show for one governed action?
Inspect the example record and the control it demonstrates. Each published artefact states its source, verification method and limits.
View the example evidence recordCheck a signed evidence pack
Download the published pack, verification key and script. Read the signing and provenance limits alongside the result.
Verify the signed packStart with the workflow you want to govern.
Explore ACP, or describe the agent action you want to evaluate. A proof-of-concept enquiry starts a conversation about your workflow and the evidence you need.
Sign-in opens the product. An enquiry does not book a meeting.
Assess workplace AI exposure
If your immediate question is where sensitive data can enter workplace AI tools, the existing exposure check and assessment remain available.
Explore the assessmentAbout IntelXview
IntelXview builds AI Control Plane to connect policy decisions with inspectable evidence.
Read about the companyPractical notes on AI governance
All insightsAI Governance
How to Stop Staff Pasting Sensitive Data into AI Tools
Staff paste client data, legal documents, and financial records into ChatGPT and Copilot every day. Most firms have a policy that forbids it and no control that enforces it. Here is how to build something that actually holds.
Read insightAI Governance
Is Gemini for Google Workspace Safe? Data Exposure Risks
Gemini for Google Workspace is safe at the platform level, but it inherits whatever sharing and permission sprawl already exists in your Drive and Gmail. Here is where the real data exposure risk sits, and what to examine before you let Gemini loose on your organisation.
Read insightAI Governance
Agentic AI Security: The Risks of Autonomous AI Agents
Agentic AI systems can book meetings, send emails, query databases, and execute code without human sign-off at each step. That autonomy creates a security model most enterprise teams have not planned for. Here is where the risks sit and what controls actually work.
Read insight